英美报刊选读期末复习自测题

   责任教师  聂光华

Part One  Turn the following into Chinese (20%)

The Representatives newly elected in 1984 were almost four times as wealthy as the first lawmakers elected only six years before, according to a new study based on the members’ financial reports.

Behind this remarkable swing, the study says, are two main factors: a court decision that outlawed limits on what candidates could give to their own campaigns, and the enormous growth in the cost of pursuing a seat of most means, particularly women, to mount successful challenges to entrenched office holders.

No matter what their route, young Asian Americans, largely those with Chinese, Korean and Indo-Chinese backgrounds, are setting the educational pace for the rest of America and cutting a dazzling figure at the country’s finest schools. Consider some of this fall’s freshman classes: at Brown it will be 9% Asian Americans, at Harvard nearly 14%, the M. I. T. 20%, the California Institute of Technology 21% and the University of California, Berkeley an astonishing 25%.

By almost every educational gauge, young Asian Americans are soaring. They are finishing way above the mean on math section of the Scholastic Aptitude Test and, according to one comprehensive study of San Diego area students, outscoring their peers of other races in high school grade-point averages. They spend more time on their homework, a researcher at the U. S. Department of Education fund, take more advanced high school courses and graduate with more credits than other American students. A high percentage of these young people complete high school and finish college than do American students. Trying to explain why so many Asian-American students are super-achievers, Harvard Psychology Professor Jerome Kagan comes up with this simple answer: “To put it plainly, they work harder.”

Part Two A  Turn the underlined parts into Chinese (30%)

1run for Congress

2. British Foreign Secretary 

3. They were just taking a break from the students and most exhilarating work of their lives.

4. U.S. News & World Report

5. UNESCO

6. They were just taking a break from the students and most exhilarating work of their lives.

7Senate Majority Whip

8Westinghouse Science Talent Search

9. They dressed her up in a prim gray suit.

10. Chicago Tribune

11. Daily Telegragh

12. The classroom is a virtual one, with students logging in from all over the globe.

13Free Press

14Shao Yibo scribbled down a business proposal, sold his belongings and left for Shanghai.

15Those on the roster aver age 16 years of age—and 14 arrested.

16. Later in 1986, crack cocaine hit the drowsy port city of Jacksonvill.

17Both activities, it turns out, are harming the ancient Buddhist grottoes that make this place one of China’s cultural wonders.

 18. Many of the murals are already sagging or peeling from the earthen walls.

Part Two BTurn the following into Chinese (30%)

1lobbyist                   2. Congress

3. the Capitol                 4.senate

5 .Watergate                  6. G.O.P.

7.cover story                  8.whiz kid

9. appeals court               10. a law withholding taxes on interest payment

11. diversity of democracy       12. political realignment                 

13. Free Press                 14. the budget package                  

15. Wall Street Journal          16. the Commonwealth                         

17. Asia—Pacific summit       18.  sovereignty                         

19. British Foreign Secretary    20. Secretary of State

Part Three  Reading Comprehension (50%)

                          Passage One

Many parents who welcome the idea of turning off the TV and spending more time with the family are still worried that without TV they would constantly be on call as entertainers for their children. They remember thinking up all sort of things to do when they were kids. But their own kids seem different, less resourceful, somehow. When there's nothing to do, these parents observe regretfully, their kids seem unable to come up with any thing to do besides turning on the TV.
One father, for example, says. “When I was a kid, we were always thinking up things to do, projects and games. We certainly never complained in an annoying way to our parents, ‘I have nothing to do!’ He compares this with his own children today: “They're simply lazy. If someone doesn't entertain them, they'll happily sit there watching TV all day. ”
There is one word for this father's disappointment: unfair. It is as if he were disappointed in them for not reading Greek though they have never studied the language. He deplores(
哀叹)his children's lack of inventiveness, as if the ability to play were something innate(天生的)that his children are missing . In fact, while the tendency to play is built into the human species, the actual

ability to play-to imagine, to invent, to elaborate on reality in a playful way-and the ability to gain fulfillment from it, these are skills that have to learned and developed.
Such disappointment, however, is not only unjust, it is also destructive. Sensing their parents' disappointment, children come to believe that they are, indeed, lacking something, and that this makes them less worthy of admiration and respect. Giving children the opportunity to develop new resources, to enlarge their horizons and discover the pleasures of doing things on their own is, on the other hand, a way to help children develop a confident feeling about themselves as capable and interesting people.
Questions:
1.According to many parents, without TV, their children would like them to_____.

2.Many parents think that, instead of watching a lot of TV, their children should_______.

3.The father often blames his children for not being able to entertain themselves. This is

unfair because they______.

4.When parents show constant disappointment in their children, the destructive effect is
that the children will __________.

5.Developing children's self-confidence helps bring them up to be________.                              

                    Passage Two

Campaign strategists have agreed to focus on the Senate, where leaders hope to complete work on the budget package by May 1. “We felt that if the Senate defeated the proposal, it would not even come up in the House,” says John Rother, legislative director for the 18—million—member American Association of Retired Persons.

Targeted mainly are Republicans, who control the Senate, with particular emphasis on the 21 who face re—election next year. The next election looms large in the lobbyists’ strategy. “We shall not forget if Congress behaves in an unfriendly fashion to the senior citizens of the United States,” warns Jacob Clayman, president of

the NCSC, which represents 4.5 million persons. “We shall remember—and 1986 is just around the corner.”

Eric Shulman, legislative director for the NCSC, explains: “Those up for reelection will have their ears closest to the ground—and we are making as much of a rumble as we can. We see this issue being won or lost not in Washington but out in the countryside.” Adds Arthur Flemming, former U. S. commissioner on aging and now a lobbyist for the elderly:” “It’s the grass roots that convey the message most effectively.”

 1.…… where leaders hope to complete

       AHouse leaders                               Bfloor leaders

       CCongressional                               DSenate leaders

 2.… it would not even come up in the House

A the House of Commons             B the House of Representatives

Cthe House of Lords                 Dthe Senate

 3Targeted mainly are Republicans who control the Senate

Aso said because the Democrats hold more seats in the Senate

Bso said because the Republicans hold more seats in the Senate

Cso said because the Republicans hold less seats in the Senate

Dso said because the Republicans Party holds more congressional seats

 4.“It’s the grass roots that convey the message most effectively.

Aordinary citizens or voters                    Bbasic structures

Cpoliticians                                    DCongressmen

                          Passage Three

The new cadet stands in full battle dress, his face smeared with blackgreen camouflage grease, sweltering in the August sun. Just two months earlier, David Craft, 19, of Rockford, Ohio, was a high school stud. Now, in cadet slang, he is a beanhead. "It's kind of degrading," he allows.

"We were the top of our class. Now we're dirt, scum. They’re always on you. Whatever you do is wrong."

Craft’s best friend from high school, who accompanied him to West Point, has already dropped out. "He couldn't take the loss of freedom," explains Craft. "No McDonald's." Does Craft wish he were back home at Ohio State, drinking beer? The whites of his eyes grow large. "No, sir!" he exclaims. "This is serious business!"

    Serious business, indeed. West Point, said General George S. Patton Jr., class of '09 is "a holy place." The academy, said General Maxwell Taylor, '22, is "not for everyone, only for those with a true vocation." That calling is to lead in battle. "Your mission," General Douglas MacArthur, '03, told the cadets in 1962, "remains fixed, determined, inviolable: it is to win our wars."

    Yet in the years since Viet Nam, critics in and out of uniform have repeatedly charged that too many officers have become cautious bureaucrats, adept at Pentagon politics perhaps, but interested more in advancing their careers than in preparing for the brutal exigencies of combat. In an era of unconventional warfare and low-level guerrilla struggles, military reformers sometimes fear that a rigid military-academy mind-set is geared to yesterday's wars of attrition. They question whether West Point is turning out the kind of officers that the nation needs.

1. The new cadet stands in full battle dress...

   A. a student in a military school or academy         B. a student in a college or university

   C. a navy officer                               D. an Army General

2. The academy, said General Maxwell Taylor...

A. the Navy academy                          B. the science academy

C. West Point                                D. Aarvad Business School

3. Yet in the years since Viet Nam...

A. a country in Asia                           B. a city in Laos     

C. a place in Bosnia                           D. the Viet Nam War

4. … adept at Pentagon politics perhaps, …

A. ignorant             B. know              C. expert                D. hate

                             Passage Four

15 Killed by Rebel bomb in Kashmir

                                    From International Herald Tribune, September 1995

SRINAGAR, India-At least 15 people were killed when a car bomb exploded in central Srinagar at midday Monday, witnesses said. Five of the dead appeared to be soldiers, they said.

Officials at a government-run hospital said that 20 people were admitted with wounds and that three were in surgery. One of the wounded died upon arrival at the hospital.

A caller identifying himself as a member of Hizbul Mujahidin, a pro-Pakistan group, contacted several news agencies to claim responsibility for the attack.

Hizbul Mujahidin is the most powerful rebel group favoring a merger with Pakistan. Other groups want independence from Indian rule.

The bomb went off in a car near a police station and outside a branch of the government owned State Bank of India, where Indian soldiers fighting the separatist insurgency in Jammu and Kashmir gather at the beginning of every month to collect their pay.

Witnesses said an army truck was parked in the vicinity when the bomb went off. Three cars and five scooters were destroyed in the blast.

Witnesses said that two of the victims were women and that five others wore military uniforms. Some of the corpses were badly mutilated.

Security forces arrived quickly and carried off the bodies. The police cordoned off the area, fearing another attack.

The blast was preceded by a grenade attack a few blocks away that appeared to have been a diversionary measure.

The explosion was near Ahdoo’s, one of the only hotels left open in the city. The hotel is full of foreign journalists covering the Kashmir hostage crisis, which entered its third month Monday.

Four Westerners have been held hostage by guerrillas in the Kashmir Valley since July 4. A fifth hostage, Hans Christian Ostroe of Norway, way found beheaded in a remote region Aug.13.

The guerrillas have said they will kill the remaining hostages unless the Indian government releases 15 jailed separatists.

1 A car bomb killed        people in central Srinagar.

   a. 5                    b. 15                     c. 20were

2        claimed responsibility for the attack.

a. A rebel group         b. an Indian group           c. A member of Hizbul Mujahidin

3The bomb went off outside a bank branch where Indian soldiers gathered to        .

a. fight the rebels        b. protect the bank          c. collect their pay

4        Destroyed in the blast.

a. An army truck was    b. Three scooters and five cars were  c. Three cars and 5 scooters were

5Police cordoned off the area because        .

 a. they feared there might be another attack   b. there was a grenade attack a few blocks away

c. they had to carry off the bodies

WASHINGTON, Sept. 23 – The House of Representatives, which prides itself on being “the people’s House.” Has been turning into a rich man’s club.

The representatives newly elected in 1984 were almost four times as wealthy as the first-term lawmakers elected only six years before, according to a new study based on the members’ financial reports.

Behind this remarkable swing, the study says, are two main factors: a court decision that outlawed limits on what candidates could give to their own campaigns, and the enormous growth in the cost of pursuing a seat in Congress. As a result, it is increasingly difficult for candidates of modest means, particularly women, to mount successful challenges to entrenched office holders.

One solution, the authors contend, is a system of public financing for campaigns, but Congress seems in no mood to change the political rules any time soon.

“The lower chamber is going upper class,” said Mark Green, the president of The Democracy Project, a public policy institute based in New York. “But this evolution from a House of Representatives to a House of Lords denies the diversity of our democracy. It establishes a de facto property qualification for office that increasingly says: low and middle income need not apply.”

The Democracy Project produced the study in cooperation with the United States Public Interest Research Group, a similar institute situated in Washington. But their research was not entirely theoretical. In 1980 Mr. Green was the unsuccessful Democratic candidate for Congress in New York’s 15th District, in Manhattan. The winner was Bill Green, one of the wealthiest members of Congress.

Of Assets and Millionaires

Members of Congress must report their assets in broad categories, not exact numbers, so the figures in the study are not precise. But the minimum average wealth of the 43 lawmakers first elected last year was $251,292.  Six years earlier, the 74 new members reported an average of only $41,358 in assets.  With inflation figured in, the increase was almost 400 percent in real terms.

Moreover, financial data on the class of 1978 indicated only one millionaire, William F. Clinger Jr., a Pennsylvania Republican. Last year’s newcomers included 15 possible millionaires, more than a third of the entire group. Topping the list was Joseph J. Dioguardi, a Westchester Republican, who listed assets of $1 million to $2.46 million.

The main reason for the change, Mr. Green maintains, is the Supreme Court decision of 1976 in the case of Buckley V. Valeo. In that case, the Court ruled that limits mandated by Congress on the amount a candidate could give to his or her own campaign were an unconstitutional abridgment of individual rights. At the same time, the Court upheld limits on amounts contributed by outsiders.

“Quite naturally”, Mr. Green said, “this puts a premium on personal wealth.

The 43 Representatives newly elected in 1984 spent an average of $459,344; of that, $50,329 was their own money in an average case. Eight of the 43 spent more than $100,000 in personal funds but the clear leader was Tommy F. Robinson, an Arkansas Democrat, who contributed $441, 167 to his own campaign. Mr. DioGuardi was next with a personal donation of $210,000. 

The Senate puts an even higher premium on wealth. Last year the average candidate for the Senate spent $2 million, and the roster of millionaires in the Senate is steadily growing.

The second factor putting a premium on personal wealth, Mr. Green argues, is the rapid rise of political action committees. They tend to favor incumbents with their campaign contributions, and a result, Mr. Green says, is that it takes a wealthy challenger to make a race of things.

One apparent effect is the obstacle this poses for women who run for Congress. While women in rapidly rising numbers are capturing local and state offices, their representation on the national level has stayed static. The class of 1984 included only two women: Helen D. Bentley of Maryland and Jan Meyers of Kansas, both Republicans.

“It is largely men who control wealth in America,” Mr. Green said, “and if wealth is a major variable in political success, that automatically means more men will run and win.”

Fred Wertheimer, president of Common Cause, the public affairs lobby that studies campaign financing issues, summed up the situation this way: “Today, if you’re not personally wealthy, and you’re not willing to indebt yourself to the PAC’s, you face an uphill struggle just to get your message on the table.

The authors of the study argue that some form of public financing for campaigns should be instituted.  “Competition for public office should be based more upon merit than money,” asserted Gene Karpinski, executive director of the public interest research group.

Mr. Wertheimer argues that “members of Congress know they have a national scandal on their hands” and are willing to consider public financing, or at least a total limit on PAC contributions. But the chances for change in the current system remain decidedly poor.

Obviously the current occupants of Capitol Hill have kept their seats under the present rules, which clearly favor incumbents. Accordingly, Mr. Green maintains, Congress is still probably “several scandals away” from a serious push to change the campaign system.

(From The New York Times, September 24, 1985)

Answer the following questions:

1. Whom does the phrase “ the first-term lawmakers” in the second paragraph refer to?

2. Why has the House of Representatives been changing into a rich man’s club or a House of Lords?

3. In what way did the Court decision favor the wealthy candidates?

4. Are women far behind men in getting Congressional offices? Please give an example for your answer.

5. What role do political action committees play in a campaign for public office?

6. According to the author of the study, on what basis should the political race for public office be placed?